Platform Comparison / Model Selection Reference · Updated June 2026
Models are listed cheapest-first within each brand.
Collapse any AI group that you don't use.
No tasks match ""
| Task | Best Overall |
Claude (Anthropic)
|
ChatGPT (OpenAI)
|
Gemini (Google)
|
Copilot (Microsoft)
|
Grok (xAI)
|
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haiku 4.5 Cheapest |
Sonnet 4.6 Balanced |
Opus 4.8 Heavy |
Fable 5 Flagship |
Instant Default |
Thinking Reasoning |
Pro Heaviest |
3.1 Flash-Lite Cheapest |
3.5 Flash Balanced |
3.1 Pro Heaviest |
Smart Default |
Think Deeper Reasoning |
Deep Research Heaviest |
Grok Build Cheapest |
Grok 4.3 Balanced |
4.20 Multi-Agent Heaviest |
||
|
Coding
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Quick code checkDebug / syntax / review | ClaudeSonnet 4.6Catches real bugs without flagship pricing | Skip Misses the subtler logic bugs |
Sonnet ★ Finds logic errors and explains the fix in plain language |
Skip More than a spot check needs |
Skip Never for quick checks |
Instant ★ Fast, free, and fine for syntax and small logic checks |
Skip Save it for harder problems |
Skip Not for spot checks |
Skip 3.5 Flash reviews code better |
3.5 Flash ★ Good review quality for the price |
Skip Overkill |
Smart ★ Decent quick reviews inside the tools you already use |
Skip Overkill for spot checks |
Skip It's a research agent, not a reviewer |
Build ★ A coding model that costs very little |
Fallback Works, but Build is cheaper for this |
Skip Overkill for quick checks |
| Full app buildMulti-file, architecture | ClaudeOpus 4.8Tops the coding benchmarks; keeps big projects coherent | Skip Loses track across files |
Fallback Good for scoped modules |
Opus ★ 88.6% on SWE-bench Verified; the most reliable builder here |
Upgrade if You run long unattended builds and the 2x price is fine |
Skip Too light for this |
Thinking ★ GPT-5.5 is a close second, and the best at terminal work |
Upgrade if The architecture is genuinely hard |
Skip Wrong tier |
Fallback Capable, but expect some re-prompting on deep logic |
3.1 Pro ★ Handles big codebases with its 1M-token window |
Fallback Scoped builds only |
Think Deeper ★ GPT-5.5 Thinking with your repo and docs in context |
Skip Research agent, not a builder |
Fallback Fine for small, scoped builds |
Grok 4.3 ★ Grok's best option, though it trails the leaders on big builds |
Skip More agents don't close the coding gap |
| Full web buildHTML / CSS / JS / layout | ClaudeOpus 4.8Layout, CSS, and accessibility handled in one pass | Skip Not reliable for responsive layouts |
Fallback Good for single components |
Opus ★ The strongest design instincts of any model here |
Skip Opus already does this well |
Skip Too light |
Thinking ★ Ties front end and back end together well |
Skip Rarely needed for web work |
Skip Too light |
3.5 Flash ★ Fast and surprisingly good at front-end code |
Upgrade if The app is large or visually complex |
Fallback Component-level work only |
Think Deeper ★ Solid full-stack reasoning |
Skip Wrong tool |
Fallback Scoped components only |
Grok 4.3 ★ Capable, less polished on CSS details |
Skip Overkill |
|
Writing
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Quick social postsShort copy, captions | Gemini3.1 Flash-LiteCosts almost nothing; short copy doesn't need more | Haiku ★ Fast and easy on your quota |
Skip More than you need |
Skip Wasteful |
Skip Never for captions |
Instant ★ The free default handles short posts fine |
Skip Overkill |
Skip Not for captions |
Flash-Lite ★ The cheapest option on this page, and captions don't need more |
Skip Spends more than the job is worth |
Skip Never for captions |
Smart ★ Quick drafts in the apps you already use |
Skip Overkill for captions |
Skip Wrong tool |
Skip It's a coding model |
Grok 4.3 ★ Cheap, and it knows what's trending on X right now |
Skip Never for captions |
| Long-form blog1,000 to 3,000+ words | ClaudeSonnet 4.6Holds your voice across thousands of words | Skip Voice drifts over long pieces |
Sonnet ★ Matches your voice and keeps the thread from intro to close |
Upgrade if The post needs expert-level synthesis |
Skip Save the money for harder work |
Skip Not reliable past a few hundred words |
Thinking ★ GPT-5.5 writes noticeably better than earlier versions |
Skip Not worth it for blogging |
Skip Loses coherence |
3.5 Flash ★ Decent drafts that tend to run long; trim after |
Upgrade if You want research woven in as it writes |
Smart ★ Fine if you draft in Word anyway |
Upgrade if The piece is research-dense |
Skip Wrong tool |
Skip It's a coding model |
Grok 4.3 ★ Solid writing, and current on live topics |
Skip Overkill for blogging |
|
Research and Strategy
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Article researchSource synthesis, fact-finding | Gemini3.5 FlashGoogle Search built in, at low cost | Skip Too shallow for source work |
Sonnet ★ Good with web search on, and honest about what it can't verify |
Upgrade if Accuracy is high-stakes |
Upgrade if It's a long, multi-source dig worth the premium |
Skip Too light for research |
Thinking ★ Deep Research mode does the legwork for you |
Upgrade if The research feeds a big decision |
Skip Not enough depth |
3.5 Flash ★ Searches Google as it works and costs very little |
Upgrade if You need academic-grade cross-referencing |
Fallback Quick lookups only |
Skip Deep Research is the better Copilot tool here |
Deep Research ★ A dedicated research agent; strongest when your sources live in M365 |
Skip Wrong tool |
Grok 4.3 ★ Live X and web data; good for fast-moving stories |
Upgrade if It's a large multi-source job |
| Prompt engineeringBuild prompts for AI tools | ClaudeOpus 4.8Reasons about model behavior better than anything else | Skip Lacks the meta-reasoning |
Fallback Fine for simpler prompts |
Opus ★ Catches the failure modes you'd otherwise hit in production |
Upgrade if The prompt drives an autonomous agent |
Skip Not suited |
Thinking ★ Precise instruction building |
Upgrade if The prompt runs inside agentic workflows |
Skip Wrong tier |
Fallback Adequate for basic prompts |
3.1 Pro ★ Works through prompt logic step by step |
Fallback Basic prompt drafting |
Think Deeper ★ Breaks down prompt structure and failure paths |
Skip Wrong tool |
Skip Not suited |
Grok 4.3 ★ Decent, less sharp on edge cases |
Fallback Several agents on one prompt, rarely worth it |
|
Additional Common AI Use-Cases
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Email draftingClient, internal, outreach | ClaudeHaiku 4.5Clean, professional, and cheap | Haiku ★ Clean professional drafts at the lowest Claude price |
Upgrade if The email is tone-sensitive or high-stakes |
Skip No reason to |
Skip Definitely not |
Instant ★ Reliable tone control on the free default |
Upgrade if It's a tricky negotiation |
Skip Never needed |
Flash-Lite ★ Cheap and fine for routine mail |
Upgrade if You're drafting in bulk with nuance |
Skip Never for email |
Smart ★ Drafts right inside Outlook |
Upgrade if The email needs context from your files and meetings |
Skip Wrong tool |
Skip It's a coding model |
Grok 4.3 ★ Capable, nothing special for email |
Skip Never for email |
| Data analysisCSV, metrics, pattern-finding | Gemini3.1 ProReads huge datasets and runs its own analysis code | Skip Not enough for real inference |
Fallback Surface-level patterns only |
Opus ★ Strong on messy, ambiguous data |
Upgrade if You want it to build and check a whole analysis on its own |
Skip Not suited |
Thinking ★ Handles big CSVs and multi-step interpretation |
Upgrade if The analysis is genuinely hard |
Skip Not suited |
Fallback Quick structured summaries |
3.1 Pro ★ Top reasoning scores, a huge context window, and it charts the results |
Fallback OK when the data lives in Excel |
Think Deeper ★ Excel agent mode with Python, and it can run Claude under the hood |
Skip Wrong tool |
Skip Not suited |
Fallback Capable on clean data |
Multi-Agent ★ Several agents on one dataset, but rivals reason better |
| Document summaryPDFs, contracts, reports | Gemini3.5 FlashReads up to a million tokens and summarizes fast | Skip Misses nuance in dense documents |
Sonnet ★ Reliable extraction with a 1M-token window |
Upgrade if It's a legal document needing judgment calls |
Skip Summaries don't need a flagship |
Skip Not suited |
Thinking ★ Good at pulling what matters from long files |
Upgrade if Legal interpretation required |
Fallback Simple documents, nearly free |
3.5 Flash ★ A million tokens of context at a mid-tier price |
Upgrade if You're synthesizing several documents at once |
Smart ★ Summarizes your own Word and SharePoint files where they live |
Upgrade if The summary needs interpretation, not just extraction |
Skip Wrong tool for single documents |
Skip Wrong tool |
Grok 4.3 ★ 1M-token window, handles long reports |
Upgrade if Huge document sets; it reads 2M tokens |
| BrainstormingIdeas, concepts, angles | ChatGPTInstantFast, varied, and free | Fallback Ideas start repeating sooner |
Sonnet ★ More variety, fewer clichés |
Skip Depth isn't what brainstorming needs |
Skip Definitely not |
Instant ★ Rapid-fire ideas on the free default |
Upgrade if You want strategy baked into the ideas |
Skip Overthinks it |
Flash-Lite ★ Quick concept lists at almost no cost |
Upgrade if The brainstorm needs research behind it |
Skip Overkill |
Smart ★ Handy when ideas should draw on your work files |
Skip Overthinks it |
Skip Wrong tool |
Skip It's a coding model |
Grok 4.3 ★ Live X data helps with trend-driven ideas |
Skip Never for ideation |
| SEO and metadataTitle tags, meta, alt text | Gemini3.1 Flash-LiteThe cheapest way to do metadata at scale | Haiku ★ Good with character limits |
Skip Unnecessary |
Skip Never for metadata |
Skip Never for metadata |
Instant ★ Handles bulk metadata fine |
Skip Not needed |
Skip Wasteful |
Flash-Lite ★ Costs the least and follows structure rules reliably |
Skip Overkill |
Skip Never for metadata |
Smart ★ Fast and fine for drafts |
Skip Not needed |
Skip Wrong tool |
Fallback Cheap, and structured output suits it |
Grok 4.3 ★ Low cost, handles structured output well |
Skip Never for metadata |
| Strategic planningBusiness decisions, proposals | ClaudeOpus 4.8The best read on risks, tradeoffs, and edge cases | Skip Can't weigh competing variables |
Fallback Lower-stakes planning |
Opus ★ Surfaces the risks and edge cases others gloss over |
Upgrade if The decision is big enough to justify the premium |
Skip Not suited |
Thinking ★ Strong tradeoff analysis |
Upgrade if It's the hardest kind of strategy problem |
Skip Not suited |
Fallback Tactical planning only |
3.1 Pro ★ Structured decision analysis with plenty of context room |
Fallback When the plan draws on your org's data |
Think Deeper ★ Deep reasoning with your company context loaded |
Upgrade if The plan needs market research first |
Skip Not suited |
Fallback Capable, less thorough on edge cases |
Multi-Agent ★ Several agents argue it out, but the leaders reason better solo |
| Automation workflowsAPIs, tools, logic chains | ClaudeOpus 4.8Runs long multi-step jobs without losing the plot | Skip Not for conditional logic at scale |
Fallback Simple automations |
Opus ★ The agentic workhorse; built for API chains and tool use |
Upgrade if Agents run for hours or days unattended |
Skip Not suited |
Thinking ★ Conditional flows, API chains, error handling |
Upgrade if Failure is expensive |
Skip Not suited |
3.5 Flash ★ Quick and agentic, with code execution built in |
Upgrade if The logic is deeply nested |
Fallback Power Automate basics |
Think Deeper ★ Best for M365 agents; the new Cowork agent runs multi-step jobs |
Skip Wrong tool |
Fallback Good for API glue code |
Fallback Capable, less proven for agents |
Multi-Agent ★ Actually built as a team of agents |